Introduction
Sri Lanka’s employment law framework, historically a complex mosaic of colonial-era ordinances and post-independence statutes, is currently on the cusp of a significant transformation. This process of reform, centred around the proposed new unified Employment Act, has been described as a 'revolution' due to its ambitious goal of repealing over a dozen disparate laws and introducing a modernised, liberalised legal regime. This essay will discuss this ongoing revolution in Sri Lankan employment law. It will argue that while the proposed reforms aim to address the rigidity and obsolescence of the current system to foster economic growth and flexibility, they also represent a contentious shift in the balance of power between employers and employees, raising significant questions about the future of worker protection in the country. The discussion will first outline the key features and perceived failings of the existing legal framework, then examine the core components of the proposed new Employment Act, and finally, consider the competing arguments surrounding this legal overhaul.
The Existing Framework: A Call for Modernisation
The current body of employment law in Sri Lanka is not codified into a single piece of legislation. Instead, it comprises numerous statutes, each governing different aspects of the employment relationship and often applying to different categories of workers. Key among these are the Wages Boards Ordinance No. 27 of 1941, the Shop and Office Employees (Regulation of Employment and Remuneration) Act No. 19 of 1954 (SOEA), and, most notably, the Termination of Employment of Workmen (Special Provisions) Act No. 45 of 1971 (TEWA).
This fragmented structure has long been criticised for being complex, cumbersome, and out of step with the demands of a modern, globalised economy. Employers, in particular, have identified the TEWA as a major impediment to business flexibility and investment. The TEWA severely restricts an employer's right to terminate the employment of a workman for non-disciplinary reasons. Except for termination upon reaching the age of retirement, an employer with more than fifteen workmen cannot terminate employment without either the written consent of the employee or the prior written approval of the Commissioner-General of Labour (Ariyaratne, 2023). This process is known to be lengthy, uncertain, and heavily weighted towards job preservation, making it difficult for businesses to restructure, downsize, or adapt to changing market conditions. The World Bank has previously noted that such rigid employment protection legislation can discourage formal hiring and constrain business growth (World Bank, 2019). Consequently, the pressure for reform has mounted for years, with proponents arguing that a more liberalised framework is essential for attracting foreign direct investment and enhancing national competitiveness.
The New Employment Act: A Revolutionary Proposal
The centrepiece of the current revolution is the draft Employment Act. This proposed legislation seeks to repeal a wide array of existing laws, including the SOEA and the TEWA, and consolidate them into a single, comprehensive labour code. The stated objectives are to simplify the law, create a more flexible labour market, and encourage female labour force participation (Daily FT, 2023). The key revolutionary aspects of the draft Act can be categorised as follows.
Consolidation and Simplification
The most fundamental change is the move towards a single, unified law. By repealing approximately fourteen different statutes and creating one source of employment regulation, the Act aims to bring clarity and consistency to a field long characterised by overlap and confusion. This consolidation is intended to make the law more accessible and easier to navigate for both employers and employees, reducing administrative and compliance costs.
Introduction of Labour Market Flexibility
The draft Act introduces significant flexibility in several areas. It formally recognises and regulates various forms of 'atypical' work, such as part-time work, temporary employment, and remote working arrangements. This is a departure from the old framework, which was largely designed around the concept of a full-time, permanent employee. Furthermore, the Act proposes changes to working hours, moving towards a standard five-day, 45-hour week, but also allowing for flexibility in how these hours are arranged, subject to agreement (Sunday Times, 2023). These changes are designed to reflect contemporary work practices and provide businesses with the agility to respond to operational needs.
Reforming Termination of Employment
Arguably the most contentious and revolutionary aspect of the new Act is the repeal of the TEWA and its replacement with a new system for termination. Instead of requiring prior approval from the Commissioner of Labour for non-disciplinary terminations, the new law proposes a formula-based compensation model. An employer would have the right to terminate an employee's contract for economic, technological, or structural reasons, provided they pay a prescribed level of compensation (Department of Labour, 2023). This compensation is expected to be calculated based on the employee's years of service. This marks a paradigm shift from a system of job security based on state-sanctioned retention to one based on a predictable, albeit purely financial, safety net.
Discussion: Balancing Flexibility and Security
The proposed reforms have generated a vigorous debate, highlighting the inherent tension between economic liberalisation and social protection. Proponents of the new Act, including business chambers and employer federations, argue that it is a long-overdue and essential modernisation. They contend that the increased flexibility, particularly regarding termination, will make Sri Lanka a more attractive destination for investment, encourage employers to create more formal-sector jobs, and ultimately boost economic growth (Ceylon Chamber of Commerce, 2023). From this perspective, the old system, especially the TEWA, created a rigid labour market that stifled dynamism and discouraged hiring. The move to a formula-based compensation system is seen as providing clarity and predictability, allowing businesses to manage their human resources more efficiently.
Conversely, trade unions and labour rights advocates have voiced strong opposition, viewing the reforms as a direct assault on workers' rights and job security (Fernando, 2023). They argue that the repeal of the TEWA removes a critical layer of protection against arbitrary dismissal. The concern is that the proposed compensation formula may not be adequate to support a worker and their family during a period of unemployment, particularly in an economy with a limited social security system. There is a fear that the increased flexibility for employers will lead to a rise in precarious work and a 'hire and fire' culture, eroding the stable employment relationships that the old laws sought to protect (ILO, 2022). The changes to rules on night work for women, while intended to boost participation, have also been questioned on grounds of safety and social impact without adequate supportive measures being in place.
Conclusion
The proposed new Employment Act undoubtedly represents a revolutionary moment for Sri Lankan employment law. It signals a decisive move away from a protectionist, state-led model of labour regulation towards a more liberalised framework prioritising flexibility, predictability, and economic efficiency. The reforms attempt to modernise an antiquated legal structure and align it with the perceived needs of a 21st-century economy. However, this revolution is not without its controversies. The core debate revolves around whether the new legal framework strikes the right balance between providing employers with necessary flexibility and ensuring meaningful protection for employees. While the old system was widely seen as flawed and in need of reform, critics of the new proposals argue that the pendulum has swung too far in favour of capital, potentially weakening the position of the Sri Lankan worker. The ultimate success or failure of this legal revolution will depend on whether its final, enacted form can navigate these competing interests to create a system that is not only good for business but also fair and just for the workforce it governs.
References
Ariyaratne, S. (2023) A timely overhaul of labour laws. [Online] Available at: https://www.ft.lk/columns/A-timely-overhaul-of-labour-laws/4-755331 (Accessed: 15 May 2024).
Ceylon Chamber of Commerce (2023) Chamber welcomes new unified labour law. [Press Release]. Colombo: Ceylon Chamber of Commerce.
Daily FT (2023) ‘New single Labour Law to be presented to Cabinet soon’, Daily FT, 18 October. [Online] Available at: https://www.ft.lk/top-story/New-single-Labour-Law-to-be-presented-to-Cabinet-soon/26-754215 (Accessed: 15 May 2024).
Department of Labour (2023) Stakeholder Consultation on Draft Employment Act. [Report]. Colombo: Ministry of Labour and Foreign Employment.
Fernando, N. (2023) 'Trade unions oppose new labour law draft', The Morning, 23 November.
ILO (2022) Decent Work Country Programme: Sri Lanka. International Labour Organization.
Sunday Times (2023) ‘New labour laws being finalised’, The Sunday Times, 5 November. [Online] Available at: https://www.sundaytimes.lk/231105/news/new-labour-laws-being-finalised-537494.html (Accessed: 15 May 2024).
World Bank (2019) Sri Lanka Development Update: In-Depth – Making the Most of an Aging Population. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
