Category

Intellectual property, media and technology essays

Our intellectual property, media and technology law essay examples are produced through Law Writer’s free plan, giving you a clear 2:2-standard model for reviewing structure, legal principles and issue analysis. For more demanding work, credits can be used to generate 2:1, first-class or master’s-level essays with fuller authority, sharper critical evaluation and more advanced treatment of policy, innovation and regulation.

Intellectual property, media and technology law covers the protection, control and use of creative works, inventions, brands, confidential information, digital content and communications. Essays may address copyright, patents, trade marks, passing off, designs, database rights, moral rights, performers’ rights, licensing, assignment, infringement, fair dealing, exhaustion, confidential information, trade secrets, remedies, injunctions, damages, account of profits and commercial exploitation of IP. Media and technology topics may include defamation, privacy, misuse of private information, freedom of expression, public interest journalism, data protection, UK GDPR, online harms, platform liability, intermediary responsibility, artificial intelligence, software, open-source licensing, domain names, cybercrime, e-commerce, digital markets and the regulation of emerging technologies. Strong answers often need to balance innovation, commercial protection, access to information, free speech and individual privacy.

Intellectual property - stamping a document with an official stamp or seal
Featured September 12, 2026

ULaw LLP Intellectual Property Coursework

QUESTION 1 (40 marks) MEMORANDUM To: Bilal Imran – Partner From: Mirna Sulovic – Trainee Date: [today] Subject: PregnaForm Ltd – Potential actions against Maternity Wear Discounts This memorandum will explain the causes of actions that PregnaForm Ltd (“Pregnaform”) may have against Maternity Wear Discounts (“MWD”) for selling a maternity ...

Read MORE
Intellectual property - stamping a document with an official stamp or seal

August 25, 2026

Tyla Quick, the world’s most popular pop singer, is currently on her Hype 2026 world tour. She will be coming to Auckland to perform at Eden Park for one night only on Saturday, 15th August 2026. The concert is expected to attract not only a local New Zealand crowd but also foreigners, with fans travelling from as far as the UK, Australia, Samoa and Fiji. Eden Park has a maximum capacity of 60,000 people for concerts. The company Pop and Soul is both the promoter of the Hype 2026 concert and the owner of Eden Park. The cost of a general admission ticket to attend the concert is $300 NZD. Pop and Soul also issued 1,000 limited VIP tickets (directly in front of the stage) costing $3,000 NZD per ticket. The day before the much-anticipated concert, Pop and Soul announced that general admission tickets were completely sold out, but that 100 VIP tickets were still available for sale. Caesar, a billionaire who lives in an 8-bedroom, 3-storey mansion on the hills overlooking Eden Park, has created a Facebook Event page inviting all his friends to view the Tyla Quick concert at his home. On the event page, he writes: From my very spacious balcony directly facing Eden Park we could all have a bird’s eye view of the entire concert together. If you bring your binoculars, I assure you that you will have an excellent view of Tyla Quick. It will be ten times better than the VIP Experience! Let’s call it a lavish “VIP Balcony Experience!” On the Facebook Event page, Caesar explained that he will be hiring a caterer for that night to provide Mediterranean dishes, juices and premium drinks. He further stated that “champagne would flow like water”. On Saturday, 15th August, about 100 friends showed up at Caesar’s mansion, most with binoculars in hand to view the concert. One of these friends is Slim Shady, a wealthy, award-winning film director. Caesar, who is intrigued by gadgets, uses his party as an opportunity to test out his latest Sony FX3 camera. He spent most of the night filming his party and the concert for his own private purposes. While filming, Caesar was pleasantly surprised by the quality of the camera’s extended Zoom. He was able to film Tyla Quick performing her hit songs, as if he were just 50 meters away from her. Thrilled by his raw footage, Caesar LAW141 – 2026 Written assignment downloads all his video files onto his laptop and proudly shows them to Slim Shady. Caesar then went off to socialise with his guests and to mix drinks. Impressed by the raw footage, Slim Shady transferred all the video files taken that night from Caesar’s laptop to his trusty USB stick. Slim Shady did not tell Caesar this, nor did he delete the raw digital files from Caesar’s laptop. Two weeks later, Slim Shady submitted a 15-minute documentary called “Tyla Quick – The VIP Balcony Experience!” which premiered at the prestigious Auckland Film Festival. The documentary went on to win the coveted $100,000 NZD award in the “best short film” category. Caesar is upset because he realised that the entire documentary was made up of his raw video footage taken from his Sony FX3 camera. Pop and Soul is also outraged as they consider themselves the owners of the Tyla Quick Hype 2026 concert experience, and they did not permit either Caesar or Slim Shady to film or broadcast the event. You have been asked to provide the following advice to Pop and Soul and Caesar: a) Did Pop and Soul own the Tyla Quick Hype 2026 concert, and could they file a successful injunction to prevent Slim Shady from further distributing his 15- minute award-winning documentary? (20 points) b) Could Caesar successfully sue Slim Shady for the tort of conversion? (20 points)

This assignment will provide advice to Pop and Soul and Caesar regarding their respective legal positions following the filming of ...

Read MORE
Intellectual property - stamping a document with an official stamp or seal

August 09, 2026

The infringement tests in copyright and trade mark law differ in their approach to consumer perception, market impact, and the scope of exclusive rights. Critically discuss whether these differences are justified in light of the normative justifications that underpin trade mark and copyright laws

Introduction Intellectual property law grants exclusive rights over intangible creations, but the nature and purpose of these rights vary significantly ...

Read MORE