# Access to justice and a fair trial is one of the fundamental rights under the Federal Constitution of Malaysia. How is this achieved? ## Introduction In any democratic society governed by the rule of law, the principles of access to justice and the right to a fair trial are ...
Read MOREThe Reality of Human Rights: A Gap Between Law and Practice
Introduction The concept of human rights rests on the principle that all individuals possess inherent entitlements, simply by virtue of ...
Read MOREThe application for redress of violated human rights provisions. Is it simple or cumbersome?
Introduction The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) was a landmark piece of legislation, intended to "bring rights home" by allowing ...
Read MOREAs a Media Law student, critically examine the extent to which the Cybercrime and Security Act undermines the right to Freedom of Expression in Sierra Leone.
Introduction The right to freedom of expression is a cornerstone of any democratic society, enabling public debate, holding power to ...
Read MOREExplain the purpose and implications of Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998
Introduction The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) was a significant piece of constitutional legislation which aimed to incorporate rights from ...
Read MOREWhat is needed for realization of human rights in country give vivid examples whenever necessary
Introduction The concept of human rights has evolved from abstract philosophical ideals into a set of international legal standards. However, ...
Read MOREPrisoners voting rights: a necessary protection of human rights or an undeserved privilege?
A submission proposing the motion that prisoners should be granted the right to vote. This submission proposes that granting prisoners ...
Read MOREBalancing Sovereignty and Rights: Legal Protections for Non-Citizens in the United States
Introduction The relationship between a nation-state and the non-citizens within its borders is a source of continuous legal and ethical ...
Read MOREAssignments Question: ‘’ The Human Rights Act 1998 has changed the way in which judges think about statutory interpretation. Previous approaches haf much more respect for the legislative supremacy of Parliament’’ Describe the way in which judges interpret statutes under HRA and compare this with the ways in which judges interpreted statutes before the HRA came into force explaining the extent to which they respected the legislative supremacy of Parliament.
The relationship between the judiciary and Parliament in the United Kingdom is a cornerstone of the constitution, defined by the ...
Read MOREPublic Recording vs Private Right: Does Filming in Public Extinguish the Right to Privacy?
Introduction The proliferation of smartphones and recording devices has transformed public spaces into potential film sets, raising a fundamental conflict ...
Read MORE
