The guaranteed grade
law essay writer by Barclay Littlewood, LL.B (Hons)
Free: Our basic AI essay writes to a 2:2/C Undergraduate standard.
No registration required, up to 1,000 words. Register here free to increase to 1500 words.
Your essay will be published on our site.
Paid: Want our 2:1/B, 1st/A or Masters standard AI writers? Register here.
From just £9.99/month. Generate essays of up to 5,000 words with grade guarantee. Use code TRYME70 for 70% off your 1st payment – cancel anytime.
Your essay is private & never published.
* Word counts are approximate. The AI is instructed to prioritise legal quality, relevance and analysis over padding.
Paste a writing sample? (optional, max 500 words)
What can I do with Law Writer?
Law essays
Focused legal arguments with authority, structure and critical insight.Problem questions
Apply law clearly to complex facts and scenarios.Case Notes
Analyse judgments, reasoning, precedent and wider legal significance.Case commentary
Go beyond summary with critical legal evaluation.Statutory Interpretation
Break down legislation with precision, context and authority.Mooting Submissions
Persuasive skeleton arguments built around strong legal reasoning.Legal Opinions
Clear, structured advice applying law to real issues.Legal Drafting
Professional documents shaped by legal format and purpose.Advocacy Scripts
Confident oral submissions for assessed advocacy exercises.Law Dissertations
Extended legal research with depth, structure and originality.Research Projects
Focused academic research across specialist areas of law.Reflective Journals
Thoughtful reflection linked to legal skills and development.Revision Guides
Clear, exam-focused notes, frameworks and model structures.Portfolio Work
Cohesive support across mixed legal assessment tasks.Presentation Notes
Structured legal content for confident group delivery.Marking
Structured, actionable feedback on your own research and writing.
Barclay Littlewood, Founder
Trained as a Barrister at Gray’s InnI created Law Writer because legal writing deserves better than generic AI. Having founded the UK’s first essay writing company, and later launched Uniwriter.ai, which was featured by the BBC, I have seen first-hand how quickly students and professionals are turning to AI for academic support.
But law is different. It demands authority, structure, precision and proper legal reasoning. That is why Law Writer has been built specifically for law, trained on thousands of law essays created by expert writers over many years, and supported by leading legal sources including UK legislation, case law, parliamentary material, law reform reports and other official common-law resources.
I developed Law Writer alongside a practising solicitor and former law lecturer, working with a team of qualified law writers with deep subject expertise across contract, tort, criminal, public, commercial, human rights, equity, land law and more.
This is not just another law essay tool. It is the product of decades of legal writing experience, specialist academic knowledge and a belief that AI should support better thinking, not replace it.
More about LAW WRITERLatest free generated essays:
Topic: The Supremacy of the Constitution and its Role in Upholding the Rule of Law in Malaysia
Introduction The concepts of constitutional supremacy and the rule of law are fundamental pillars of modern democratic governance. They serve
Read Article
TO: You FROM: Marama and Suliana (Senior Partners of your law firm) RE: Ngāti Waewae’s ability to sue under Rylands v Fletcher and Donoghue v Stevenson The following facts have been obtained from our client, the iwi Ngāti Waewae, and we seek your legal opinion as to the likely outcome if the iwi took an action to court under the Rylands v Fletcher and Donoghue v Stevenson lines of cases. Pedro Petrol owns a large petrol station. There are underground storage tanks which store large quantities of petrol. The tanks were supplied and installed by Storage Solutions Ltd (SS) in 2022. As part of their contract with Pedro, SS guarantees that any problems with the storage tanks will be repaired for ten years following installation. When Pedro bought the tanks, SS said they were of the highest quality and very safe and strong. They also warned as follows: SS’s tanks are the best in the business. There have not been any leaks from them to date. Just to be safe, we recommend that you perform annual checks on the tanks. If you detect unusually strong smells of petrol from the tanks, please let us know and we can carry out a check and repair of the tanks. In 2023, one year after the tanks were installed, there was a relatively small earthquake (magnitude 5.9) which concerned Pedro as to whether the tanks were still fit for purpose. He immediately asked his employee, Steven Sniffer, to check if there were any unusual smells or fumes coming from the area where the tanks were. Steven thought any checks would not be helpful, as he believed the tanks were meant to be fool- proof. He did not do any check and reported to Pedro that all was fine. However, the earthquake disturbed the ground and caused a small crack along the base of one of the tanks. Petrol began to slowly leak into the ground, but it could not be seen because of how deep the tank was in the ground. Steven was tasked by Pedro to perform annual checks of the tanks. He did do these checks in 2024 and early 2025 but he did them in a very hurried manner. At that time, there was still only a small seepage of petrol which would not have given a strong smell. In late 2025, the crack along the base of the tank ruptured much further. Ten thousand gallons of unleaded petrol escaped from the ruptured tank. The petrol travelled through the subsoil, down into an underground stream that fed a neighbouring watering hole owned by Ngāti Waewae. The watering hole was some 500 metres away from the petrol station. In early 2026, members of Ngāti Waewae noticed that their watering hole was smelling of petrol. The watering hole serviced their commercial orchard which was planted with normal strawberries. They also noticed that their crop of strawberries had all failed. Scientific testing has since confirmed that petrol had destroyed the large strawberry patch. The large strawberry patch has been totally destroyed and will need to be dug up and replaced with new soil. This will cost $2 million. The watering hole will also need to be replaced, which will cost $5 million. 3 The public is also now hesitant to buy the iwi’s strawberries punnets because of an unproven concern that there is petrol in the strawberries. In fact, no strawberries had been harvested from the orchard while there was a leak. The iwi has lost $10 million in revenue as a result. Ngāti Waewae was also thinking of selling the farm. They have been told by a valuer that their farm is now worth $2 million less because of the petrol leak. Ngāti Waewae also had several feijoa trees on the property. They survived the petrol leak and their fruit remains perfectly sellable and healthy. However, the feijoa is worth $1 million less because purchasers are not convinced they are healthy. SS says it should not be liable because it says it gave a clear warning which was ignored. There is evidence that soon after the 2023 earthquake, Pedro opened the manhole for the tanks and did not smell any petrol. The tanks were too far below the ground and the leak was too small at that time for any smell to be detected. However, if a proper check was done after the base of the tank ruptured in 2025, then the leak would have been detected. SS also says the tank was ruptured because of the earthquake and not because it was negligent. Pedro points out that his petrol station is the only one in the rural area. It provides petrol to the local residents and also many farmers in the area. Pedro also says he should not be liable because the earthquake, or his employee, were the culprits. He says his employee should have kept checking the tanks on a more regular basis. Ngāti Waewae has asked your law firm to advise on whether it should bring an action against Pedro Petrol using the Rylands v Fletcher line of cases. Ngāti Waewae also seeks advice on whether it should bring an action against Storage Solutions Ltd (SS) using the Donoghue v Stevenson line of cases. Steven Sniffer has since moved to Iceland and is uncontactable. Write a well-reasoned legal opinion for Marama and Suliana, senior partners of your law firm, that analyses the key issues and comes to justified conclusions as to the likely outcomes. In order to write your legal opinion, you are asked to rely on and only use the following cases that are in your course materials: Rylands v Fletcher CM 73 Donoghue v Stevenson CM 103 Read v Lyons CM 76 Grant v Australian Knitting Mills CM 108 Rickards v Lothian CM 79 Jull v Wilson & Horton Ltd CM 118 Eriksen v Clifton CM 87 Bowen v Paramount Builders Ltd CM 123 Holderness v Goslin CM 87 Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leathers CM 88 Hamilton v Papakura District Council CM 97 Nottingham Forest Trustee Ltd v Unison Networks Ltd CM 100
LEGAL OPINION TO: Marama and Suliana, Senior Partners FROM: [Your Name], Legal Assistant DATE: 24 May 2024 RE: Ngāti Waewae:
Read Article
ing facts and events take place in New South Wales. 1. 2. 3. 4. Harvest Lane Foods Pty Ltd (HLF) is a small Sydney company that makes bottled chilli sauces. It has three shareholders, each of whom is a director: Petra, Dev and Marco. Marco is also employed by HLF full-time as its Operations Manager. In March 2024, a national supermarket chain, FreshCo, telephoned Marco at the HLF factory and offered HLF a three-year contract to supply supermarket “own brand” chilli sauce. Marco did not tell Petra or Dev about the call. Instead, he registered a new company, Sauce Lab Pty Ltd, which he owns and controls, and signed the FreshCo contract in Sauce Lab’s name. Sauce Lab has since made a profit of $180,000 from the contract. HLF could not have funded the contract itself without borrowing. At a family barbecue in April, Marco said to Petra, “I’ve got a little something going on the side these days.” Petra laughed and said nothing further. Answer this question: Marco argues that (i) he cannot be liable because HLF could never have afforded the FreshCo contract anyway, and (ii) in any event Petra consented at the barbecue. Advise HLF on the strength of these two arguments. (8 Marks)
This advice will consider the strength of the two arguments raised by Marco in his defence against a potential action
Read ArticleFrom the Blog
Building a case list that actually works: why your current spreadsheet is failing you
If you are like most law students, you probably have a huge document called something like “Case list”, “Authorities”, or
Read more
How to read a case in twenty minutes without losing the point
Most law students read cases the way they were taught to read novels: from the top, slowly, hoping it will
Read more
What makes a first-class law essay?
Many law students know the cases. Fewer know what to do with them. The difference between a decent law essay
Read morePermission to approach the inbox?
Helpful legal writing guidance, AI updates, free credits and exclusive offers, delivered occasionally and respectfully. No spam, no waffle, no abuse of process.